Perjury Charges?

In light of this testimony (under oath) to the Senate:

"Any instructions that have been issued or anything that's been authorized by the department was checked by the lawyers . . . and deemed to be consistent with the Geneva Conventions."

should we be looking at a Perjury Charge? i mean, it was supposedly the REAL reason Clinton was impeached, right?

I'm practicing the lines i hear back in 1999 for my GOP pals: "you know, it isn't what he DID, its just that he LIED about it" i heard that so much it was like they were getting training to say it.